CategoriesUncategorized

Q and A: Do Washboard Abs Fix Anterior Pelvic Tilt?

Q: My bodyfat is about 9% (plainly visible abs, but a distended gut clouds this when in a t-shirt). I have been working furiously on my posterior chain to help fix my anterior pelvic tilt. I’ve got to think this is a common fitness enthusiast lament, and is something I want to devote myself completely to fixing. Any thoughts?

 

A: While this is something I’ve discussed in the past, to reiterate, correcting anterior pelvic tilt commonly requires strengthening of the weak anterior abdominal muscles and the hip extensors while simultaneously stretching the often tight low back and hip flexor muscles. As noted in the classic text by Kendall, et al:

Any one of the above may be a primary factor, but the tight low back and weak hip extensors are least likely to be the primary cause.

While this certainly isn’t set in stone, I feel this statement holds a lot of credence in the athletic population (as well for people who train for performance in general) since they tend to hammer their posterior chains in training. However, this isn’t to say that just because you squat, deadlift, and throw in some lunges here and there, that you’ve covered your bases.

Deadlift

We can’t neglect the fact that we sit….a lot. We sit at work. We sit in our cars. More often than not, we sit while we train. And, of course, we sit in front of the television every night as well. Needless to say, if you’ve got chronically tight hip flexors (and chances are you do), your hip extensors (glutes, hamstrings, etc) are going to be weak/inhibited due to reciprocal inhibition. It’s simple math really. A few sets of pull-throughs aren’t going to counteract the fact that you sit for 13 hours per day.

Moreover, just because you can see your six pack, doesn’t necessarily mean you have a strong abdominal wall. All it really means is that you’ve got a low body fat percentage. Well that, and girls are more likely to want to hang out with you. But that’s pretty much a given, and goes without saying.

Weakness of the anterior abdominal muscles allows the pelvis to tilt forward. These muscles are incapable of exerting the upward pull on the pelvis that is needed to help maintain a proper alignment. If you look at the force couples of the hips, a weak rectus abdominus (as well as external/internal obliques) can be just as much the culprit for APT as a weak(er) posterior chain, as seen in the picture below.

All that said, I’d suggest that you pay more attention to:

1. Stretching the Hip Flexors. Severity of lordosis from APT depends directly on the extent of hip flexor tightness. Of note, tightness of the rectus femoris and TFL does not necessarily cause lordosis in standing, since neither of these muscles are elongated over the knee joint when the knee is straight (although they certainly can be a factor).

Rather, tightness in these muscles would be most prevalent in the kneeling position. However, in a standing position, APT would be most indicative of a tight/shortened psoas; which makes sense given the amount of sitting we do. As such, one of my favorite stretches would be the warrior lunge stretch, performed throughout the day for upwards of 30-60 seconds per side:

Warrior lunge stretch

2. More Dedicated Anterior “Core” Work. As mentioned above, just because you have a steel plate for abs, doesn’t mean they’re strong. As such, I’d recommend a healthy dose of pallof presses, various planks (here, here, and here), as well as chops and lifts- as demonstrated below by Mike Robertson:

While this certainly isn’t an exhaustive list of exercises that can be done, it will undoubtedly point you in the right direction. Good luck!

CategoriesUncategorized

Miscelleaneous Miscellany Monday

1. I hate ESPN Fantasy Football with a passion. I’d go so far as to say that I hate it more than when you ask someone “is today (insert day of the week here) ?,” and they respond with “all day!” Ahhhhhh, I HATE it!!!!!

In years past, I’ve used Yahoo sports for all my fantasy needs (I know that came out wrong, but get your mind out of the gutter). However, this year we decided to go with ESPN for our annual Cressey Performance fantasy football league. Not once, but twice, I’ve “set” my team for the week—–only to realize (after the fact) that I didn’t click the “save roster” button.

With Yahoo, you set your line-up, and it’s saved automatically. As it should be. I mean you would think that with today’s technology, ESPN would get their shit together. They seemingly have cameras set up everywhere on the field except up Peyton Manning’s ass, not to mention machines that can predict the wind direction for the 2016 Super Bowl. Yet, despite all of this, they can’t somehow figure out a way to automatically save my fantasy football roster? W to the TF.

2. I know the picture below is a bit blurry, but a client of mine sent it to me this morning from her cell phone.

Cardio Coaching

Hey, if you want to pay someone to stand next to you while you run on a treadmill, go for it. Far be it from me to be judgemental. I just think this is a slippery slope to go down. What’s next? Paying someone to kick you in the nuts?

3. Only 39 more days:

4. I had a few free hours this weekend to catch up on some much needed continuing education- and was able to watch Nick Tumminello’s Warm-Up Progressions Vol. 2: Dynamic Mobility dvd.

Dynamic Mobility

True to form, Nick didn’t disappoint. Anyone who’s familiar with his stuff, knows that Nick is one of those guys that definitely thinks “outside the box.” What’s more, his creativity makes him second to none with regards to new and innovative exercises that can be implemented immediately. I put myself through this very dynamic circuit, and felt like a million bucks afterwards.

5. I’m definitely looking forward to Eric Cressey and Mike Reinold’s seminar this weekend, Testing, Treating, and Training the Shoulder: From Assessment to High Performance. We’re hosting it at CP on Sunday, and it should be a great time. While registration is closed, the seminar is being taped and will be available on dvd- so keep your eyes peeled for more information on that front. In the meantime, you can check out Mike’s blog HERE.

6. I wanted to post the recipe for this black bean dip my girlfriend made yesterday, but I just tried to call her and she isn’t picking up her phone. I’ll update this later and post it. In the meantime, check out this picture of Audrina Partridge.

Audrina Partridge

I was having this argument with some of our pro-baseball guys the other day on who was the hottest girl on The Hills, and my feeling is that Audrina is…….hands-down. Then again, I’m a brunette guy so……..

Audrina Partridge

WINNER!

UPDATE: As promised, here’s the recipe for the black bean dip:

1 can of organic black beans

1 quarter of a white onion

a few (5 or 6 if you love it) roasted garlic cloves (or one small raw clove)

2-3 tbsp of sundried tomatoes (in olive oil is better)

a little salt and pepper

some veggie broth to make sure it is moist enough to blend

CategoriesUncategorized

She Strikes Again—-I Couldn’t Resist

It’s November 6th, which not only means my birthday is like three weeks away, but also means the holiday season is right around the corner. Which is to say, I’m totally looking forward to dominating Thanksgiving dinner. It’s the one day out of the year (outside of every god damn day) that I don’t care what I shove down my pie hole.

Along similar lines, I think it’s a safe assumption that some people reading this blog are going to be one of the many who put on the inevitable holiday weight gain. Thankfully, that’s where Alwyn Cosgrove and Mike Roussell come in. They’ve just released Warp Speed Fat Loss 2.0 this week. Honestly, as much as I loved the first edition, this version undoubtedly ups the ante, and has definitely gotten a few of our clients fired up. Word on the street is that our very own Brian St. Pierre is giving it a go. We all know what happened last time…..

And, as an added incentive, there are a bunch sweet bonuses being offered for a limited time only. You can check it out HERE.

That said, it’s Friday, the weekend is here, and since I’ve written like three legit blogs in row, I figured it was high time that I made a Mephistopheles/Tracy Anderson reference (it’s been at least 48 hours). I can’t help it. It’s like I’m a moth drawn to a flame when it comes to this stuff. To that end, below is a video one of my readers (Pau) sent me. True to form, I wasn’t able to last more than two minutes before I felt a sudden urge to stick my finger in an electrical socket and/or jump into a live volcano.

It still amazes me that people actually think she knows what the hell she’s talking about. Who can honestly take her seriously after saying BS like this:

With my new method, I’ve implemented new sequencing and choreography that keeps the accessory muscles really awake and alert, and pulls the larger muscle groups in, so that your muscular structure is teeny-tiny; but strong, with lots of sexy definition.

Wow, it’s almost like I need a Moron-to-English dictionary to figure out what the hell she’s saying. If anyone would care to shed some light, I’d be happy to listen. I mean, I could have my niece talk into a camera and she would sound more credible. And she’s four years old

CategoriesUncategorized

Q and A: Getting My Wife to Train

Q: Hey Tony,

Love the blog and your T-Nation stuff — keep up the good work. Hopefully this question won’t get me punched, but I think I might only get one shot at this, so I want to make it a good one.

My wife is in good shape, but until recently didn’t have to do much to stay that way. After she turned 30, she started doing yoga and running, in an effort to stay looking good (which I sincerely appreciate). I’ve slipped in the occasional nudge to include some resistance training, but like many women she’s a bit gym-phobic, and my horror stories from the shit place I train at probably don’t help. Plus, she really likes running, and I want to be supportive.

Cut to the chase (which you no doubt saw coming): her knee has been bothering her, and after consulting some internet wizard, she declared last night that she needs to stop running “for a long time” to let the knee rest. To her credit, she did admit that the problem was most likely caused by jumping in too quickly, without building up the muscles in her legs first (“you get fit to run, not run to get fit” has been heard around the house for a while), and that resting is only going to delay the problem from happening again.

Here’s my problem: I really don’t think I’m going to get her to go to the gym with me. I thought of taking her through a body-weight circuit to keep it light and easy at first, but will this be enough? She hopes getting back into yoga will help, but she was doing that before and it obviously didn’t make that much of a difference. I just don’t see her doing deadlifts and sled pushes right now, so I’m wondering if something like lunges and body-weight squats, with some basic GPP stuff, would be beneficial in her case, and still fun/interesting enough to keep her doing it.

I’m not looking for a program, obviously, just a point in the right direction. I’m hoping that, if she doesn’t hate what I propose now, she’ll see some results and be up for some real work in the gym down the road.

Thanks for any advice you can give. Figured I’d start with the king.

The KING’S Answer (I’m totally going to run with this): First off, thanks for the kind words and for such an awesome question. Secondly, I think the approach you’re taking is exactly the right thing to do given the situation. You’re not being too pushy, and you definitely have her bests interests in mind. Hopefully with time (and little support) she’ll come around and see the light.

To that end, with regards to her knees hurting: Yes, she jumped into things too quickly. She knows it, you know it, her knee knows it. It happens, and it’s refreshing to see that she actually recognizes that fact. While the short-term “fix” (not running) will help, it’s certainly not going to fix the underlying issue(s)- whatever they may be.

Without getting too geeky, the knee is held together by active and passive structures. The passive structures include the ligaments, capsule, and menisici, while the active structures are the muscles that surround the knee (quadriceps, hamstrings, gastornemius, and popliteus).

Knee Muscles

In short, by making the active structures strong(er), it will take much of the burden off the passive structures. Read: yoga won’t do jack squat for this. Despite being marketed as the panacea of fitness (I’m surprised yoga doesn’t cure Swine Flu), yoga (alone) won’t make your wife’s knee feel better.

UPDATE: Furthermore (I can’t believe I forgot to mention this, thank you Jan), anytime you are dealing with a knee issue, you can almost guarantee that there is some sort of dysfunction going on in the hips and/or ankles (most likely the hips). So, that’s definitely something to be aware of, and might be a good idea to check out.

With regards to her reluctance to go to the gym. Indeed, it’s quite the conundrum. I can understand why the vast majority of women are intimidated to train at a gym- especially considering everything they read and/or watch (Oprah, People Magazine) tells them that the secret to a lean, svelt body is to do yoga/pilates, and to steer clear of any appreciable weights. It’s a never ending battle, and despite our best efforts, it seems it’s a never going to go away.

What’s more, the only other option is to train in the free-weight area where guys smell like cheap cologne (on a good day) and make noises that sound more like a whale passing a kidney stone than anything else. No thank you.

Training Intensity

Nevertheless, with respect to women and strength training, here’s what I like to point out:

1. Muscle is what gives the body shape and contour. If you want to look like an emaciated Olsen twin, then don’t lift weights.

Olsen Twins

2. What makes you “big and bulky” is the fat that surrounds your muscle.

3. Lets be honest, the likelihood that you’ll even work hard enough to be considered “big and bulky” is slim to none—-this goes for most guys too.

4. Muscle, while weighing more than fat, takes up 25% less space.***

5. The more LBM you have, the more your body will burn calories at rest.

While this isn’t an exhaustive list, it usually does a great job in getting my points across.

Additionally, you can have her read an article I wrote a few years ago, 4 Things Your Girlfriend Should Know. In it, I discuss why strength training pretty much makes yoga/pilates it’s bitch- among other things. All that said, I think by taking “baby steps,” and introducing her to weight training through bodyweight circuits, dynamic flexibility circuits, or maybe even trying a TRX, would be a step in the right direction. Once she gets a little more proficient and grows less intimidated stepping out of her comfort zone, you can have her start some of the programs in The New Rules of Lifting for Women, which I HIGHLY recommend all women read. If all else fails, you can do what I do whenever I want to bribe my girlfriend into doing something- offer to wash the dishes and/or watch Grey’s Anatomy. Works like a charm. Good luck!

*** NOTE: GODDAMMIT!!! Who’s the a-hole who gave Tracy Anderson permission to log onto my computer? Obviously, that statement makes no sense. What that should have said is, “muscle, while weighing the same as fat, takes up 25% less space.” I mean, how can one lb of muscle weigh more than one lb of fat? That’s just crazy talk.

CategoriesUncategorized

Meat Eaters Are Killing the Environment?

I’m posting this blog a bit later that usual, but it’s for a damn good reason. Normally I write my blogs in the morning. However, after finding out that Star Wars in Concert is coming to Boston for a two show (same day) event next weekend, I spent the bulk of my morning on Ticketmaster trying to buy tickets/dropping off my Chewbacca costume at the dry cleaners.

***SPOILER ALERT TO MY GIRLFRIEND***– just so you know, this is what you’re doing next Saturday night. Oh, and if you dress up as “slave” Princess Leia (hint hint, nudge nudge, I already bought the outfit on e-Bay), I’ll totally take you to T.G.I Fridays for free appetizer night. Who says romance is dead?

In any case, I wanted to share an article that a client of mine sent me yesterday that I thought many of you may enjoy.

The Carnivore’s Dilemma– Nicolette Hahn Niman

Inspired by the groundbreaking book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma written by Michael Pollan; this article delves into the issue of whether or not eating meat is the global warming equivalent to I don’t know, leaving all the lights on in your coal burning factory, while you drive your tank to Antarctica to melt a glacier to fill your outdoor Olympic sized pool electrically heated by Al Gore’s tears.

Without question, I completely agree with the author when she says it’s not so much the fact that eating meat in general is bad for the environment, as it is the quality of meat we choose to eat.

As the authors states, it’s absolutely true that the way we produce food is a contributor to climate change. What’s more, there IS quite a bit of credible evidence that demonstrates that meat (specifically beef) is closely linked to global warming. However, to compare meat that comes from a CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation) to that of meat that comes from more traditional farming methods-and then to lump them together in the same sentence as part of the reason for global warming- is a bit presumptuous, not to mention a drastically simplistic conclusion to draw from the research. It’s a quick read (two pages), so just read it for crying out loud!

Furthermore, and this is completely unrelated to the above article, with recent cases of an E-coli outbreak, it still dumbfounds me that the federal government doesn’t take a more stringent role in how the meat we eat is inspected. Worse still, I heard on a local talk show radio station that many (if not all) of the major meat packing companies purposely send their meat to meat grinding factories that DO NOT inspect the meat?

By and large, this fact alone should be enough to convince you to purchase your meats from places like Whole Food Markets- who not only require their meat isn’t pumped with antibiotics and hormones, but also enforce stricter guidelines in terms of animal treatment and facility inspections.

Sure, some will argue that it’s more expensive. And it is. However, I’d argue how much do you value your well-being? Is it really worth risking your health (potentially) to save $0.79 per/lb on ground beef? I mean, you’d probably question anyone who would put 87 octane in their Ferrari, right? So why are we so aloof when it comes to the crap we put into our bodies? I don’t get it.

CategoriesUncategorized

“You can’t run to get fit, you need to be fit to run.”

This is a quote that I “stole” from Mike Boyle whom I am sure “stole” it from someone else (I think it was Diane Lee actually).

The fact of the matter is, most (read: not all) people shouldn’t be running (especially women). What’s the first thing that women do to get into shape? They hightail it to the local store and buy a new pair of pearly white running shoes and go for a jog outside. What’s the first piece of equipment that women will gravitate towards if they have never set foot in a gym before? The treadmill. And more often than not, both scenarios DO NOT look pretty.

I watch some of these women running (you too men, you’re not off the hook) and it just looks painful. How can they possibly think that this is good for them? I can walk on a floor of broken glass barefoot and that would be less painful than watching some of these women run.

In all actuality, running is a fairly advanced form of exercise. Within any given mile, there are about 1500 foot strikes. Ask any personal trainer or strength coach if they would EVER allow an elite athlete (let alone your average soccer mom) to perform a plyometric protocol that calls for 1500 foot strikes on a daily basis consistently, and I am willing to bet you will get some perplexed looks. Yet, day in and day out, I will see women who are 20-30 lbs overweight trudging over to the treadmill to get their 3 miles in.

Why is running not so great for women? Well, there are a few, but the main one boils down to the Q-angle. Women, by nature have a greater Q-angle compared to men (wide hips, narrow knees) which predisposes them to a number of problems that aren’t normally an issue for men.

Please understand, that I am NOT saying that running is “bad” for all women, nor am I saying that it is “bad” in general. But what I am saying is that there are better ways to get into shape. And that’s the point…you need to be in shape to run. In doing so, you’re body will be able to handle the stress MUCH more efficiently and you will be less prone to all of those nagging injuries that come with being a runner.

I HIGHLY suggest you read this article written by Mike Boyle: “Why (Most) Women Shouldn’t Run” and read it with an objective eye and really make an effort to understand what he is trying to say. After reading the article, read Mike’s follow up article here. Needless to say, people tend to read what they want to read and often times miss the point of certain articles. If you’re already an “elite” runner or have been running for years with no problems, then obviously “we” are not referring to you and these articles and blog post aren’t meant for you. But for MANY MANY people out there, this information is so very important.

CategoriesUncategorized

Big Rocks= Big Guns

Last Friday, I discussed the Pareto Principle. To summarize, it was named after an Italian economist (Vilfredo Pareto), who demonstrated that 80% of the wealth in Italy was owned by only 20% of the population. Taking it a step further, many have described it as a Law of Unequal Return, whereupon certain activities tend to give more return on investment than others. Incidentally, it should come as no surprise that many (if not all) aspects of fitness, can be applied here.

Taking a step back for a bit, anyone who’s ever listened to Alwyn Cosgrove lecture, knows that he often discusses the Big Rocks Theory.

For those who aren’t familiar- the basic premise of the story revolves around a professor who asks his students to fill a glass with rocks, pebbles, and sand. To start, he stacks the big rocks and then asks his students how to put the rest into the bucket. Not surprisingly, the students place the pebbles into the glass, followed by the sand. In the end, everything fits into the glass.

The professor then asks his students to reverse the process. However, after pouring the sand, the students realized that the sand alone filled the entire glass and nothing else could go in.

“It is the same with time”, explained the teacher. “Give time slots to the big things before anything else. Otherwise, the inevitable sand would fill up your day”.

In short, the story demonstrates how a vast majority of trainees like to focus on minutia (sand) rather than the “bang for your buck exercises” (rocks). For those still not following, it makes more sense to identify the big items that need to be addressed, whatever your goals may be, and planning the small things around them.

We all know a friend or family member (or someone who spends way too much time on the forums) who wants to lose some fat. They’ll be quick to discuss any number of fad diets they’ve been reading about in order to get that quick fix. They’ll also talk about hormone levels, cheat meals/re-feeds, or maybe what the best macronutrient breakdown is for their blood type. Worse still, they’ll discuss which supplements they should be taking, blah blah blah. Maybe if they focused on, I don’t know, how many calories they were ingesting per day (or actually got off their ass and did something), they would get results. Focus on the big rocks people- not the minutiae.

Or what about the high school kid who weighs 140 lbs, and is trying to get hyyooooge. Here’s a theory—–less bicep curls, and more deadlifts. Better yet, when you can actually perform ten bodyweight pull-ups (with good form), then we can worry about making the guns more gunny.

Likewise, a great real-world (and less obvious) example would be a male client that I work with who wants to increase his bench press. To his credit, he’s a dedicated client who never misses a session and is willing to learn. However, if there’s one thing that I’ve had a bitch of a time trying to get him to realize is that HARDER DOES NOT EQUAL BETTER. You see, he’s always felt that in order to get better, he needs to grind out every………..single…………rep. Not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly not something that needs to happen on every rep, of every set.

What’s more, prior to training with us at CP, he benched at least three times per week (shocker!), did little to no dedicated upper back work, and had cringe worthy form; not to mention referred to benching as his “chest day,” which as you might have guessed, is grounds for going to bed with no dinner.

While it’s taken some time, we’ve definitely made some strides. We’ve done a lot of technique work- changing his bodybuilder form (flat back, elbows flared out, slooooooow tempo) to more of a powerlifting style (arched back, elbows tucked in, and more dedicated speed work). As well, we’ve focused more on the quality of reps rather than quantity of crap. As a result, he’s made some significant progress. By placing more of an emphasis on his “big rocks” (tons of technique work, upper back development, working on getting faster bar speed), rather than the sand (how can I make this exercise harder?), he’s gone from a shitty bench to a sucky bench.

With that said, what are YOUR goals? Are you focusing on the big rocks or the sand?

CategoriesUncategorized

Miscellaneous Miscellany Monday

1. I know these digital videos have been making their way around the internet for a few weeks now, but I just wanted to post them here because they’re THAT good. If you’re in any way affiliated with the fitness industry you’ll definitely get a kick out of them. THESE VIDEOS ARE NSFW…..due to language. So, unless you’re actually looking for a reason to get fired, put on your headphones. You’ve been warned.

And, to whomever made this video, I’d like to shake your hand/nominate you for an Academy Award/have your baby. This is classic!

And because I don’t want all the Crossfitters to get their panties all up in a bunch, here’s another video throwing powerlifters under the bus.

2. Since Eric and I completed our little deadlifting experiment a few weeks ago, I’ve been inundated with e-mails asking if I’d be willing to discuss the particulars behind the actual program. In a nutshell here’s what we did:

  • Gave each other a high five for being crazy enough to actually go through with it.
  • 10×1, 7×3, 4×7, 5×5—–those are what the sets/reps looked like for each corresponding day.
  • Understandably, everything else was pretty much put on hiatus during the three weeks that we did this program. So, it’s not like we were doing a lot of additional lower body training during this time. For example, on the 10×1 days, that was all I would do. It literally took me upwards of 45-50 minutes just to do ten reps (last week was ten reps of 505); and truth be told, the thought of doing anything after that made me want to vomit blood. Okay, not really- but I think you get the jist. It’s not like I was skipping over to the glute ham raise afterwards.
  • We would still train other movements, albeit in limited fashion. So, on a 5×5 day, we might add in some horizontal push variation, a light single leg movement, some scapular stability exercise, and something like Pallof Presses. The key point to remember here, is that this was a SPECIALIZATION program. I think a major mistake that many people make with their training is that they try to do too many things at once, and as a result, never really see the fruits of their labor. It’s kind of like the guy who’s goal is to get so shredded that he has vascularity in his eyebrows, yet he also wants to squat a mack truck. Pick ONE goal and go with it. You’ll be much more successful that way.
  • Eric actually summarizes the whole program in this week’s episode of The Fitcast. So rather than me blabble on and on, you can actually listen to him talk about the in’s and out’s of what we did.

3. I’m short on time this morning, so I’m going to have to leave it at that. Tomorrow, I hope to continue the discussion from Friday’s blog about the Pareto Principle, and how it applies to health/fitness/nutrition. Suffice it to say, it should be pretty interesting. But not as interesting as this………