CategoriesStuff to Read While You're Pretending to Work

Stuff to Read While You’re Pretending to Work: CrossFit “Elitism,” 10 Do’s of Mass, and Superhuman Strength

I wanted to start things off today with an interesting conversation I had with a friend/colleague of mine concerning CrossFit.

I can sense the eyes rolling already.

There’s enough CrossFit bashing on the interwebz to feed a small country (<—- that doesn’t make sense but I’m rolling with it), and I’m certainly not immune to my share of criticism. To that same tune, however, I feel like I’ve held a fairly “middle-ground” stance.

I’ve long noted my “qualms” with CrossFit, and I’ve also championed its many merits.  I see the good and bad in just about everything.  Except Justin Bieber.  He’s a douche.

And sushi.  I can’t get into sushi.  Sorry.

I’m not one of those people who talks a bunch of smack, yet has never been to or walked inside an actual CrossFit affiliate. My experience with CrossFit lies outside of watching YouTube videos which make my corneas bleed and playing internet hero on an anonymous fitness forum

As it happens, I train at an affiliate 1-2 times per week – albeit in an “open gym” format – so I feel like I’m able to give my perspective and it has some context.

Does CrossFit “Bullying” or “Elitism” Exist?

Here’s an email I received yesterday from a friend (sadly, not IronMan):

“Hope things are well my friend! I had a question and potential favor to ask from you. For the past 1.5ish years I’ve been battling with how to run our CrossFit gym as well as possible, to the point of even receiving criticism from “elite” CrossFit gyms saying we have too much of a bias towards classic strength training. 

What I have found extremely challenging is trying to establish an effective assessment system that carries over well to the CrossFit movements with which individual correctives can be prescribed.

What I was hoping to do was pay for some of your time in a consult to get some help in this area. I have tremendous respect for what you’ve done in the field, especially related to movement correction and know you would be a huge asset for us.”

My Response:

(And let me preface everything by saying I understand that CrossFit is a BRAND and that certain things are expected of its affiliates).

UPDATE:  To say that I was wrong.  Kinda.  In actuality, as another friend of mine pointed out to me via Facebook, “What many people don’t understand about CrossFit is that it is anything but a franchise that enforces uniform standards. In some ways, it is an anti-franchise. Affiliates are free to set their own fees and programming, buy the equipment they prefer, and even sell T-shirts with their affiliate name on it and keep all the money.

What I have heard is affiliate owners argue passionately for their vision and try to build their business on that basis.”

I’m honestly at a little loss for words that “elite” CrossFit gyms are criticizing anything? Why?

What makes them “elite” anyways? Total number of members? Revenue? Number of members who compete in the Games? They’re somehow more “paleo” than the next affiliate?

Who cares if someone chooses to take more of a “classic” strength and conditioning approach with their programming? 

And what does “classic strength and conditioning” even mean? Is it bad or frowned upon in the CrossFit community to help get their members stronger, to move more efficiently, and, god-for-bid, actually progress (and regress) people appropriately?

If so, I think Kelly Starrett just shit a copy of Becoming a Supple Leopard!!!

What concern is it of their’s how someone else runs THEIR facility?????

I would think, if anything, one should be applauded for actually giving a shit and taking the time to properly assess/progress his or her clients!

Are these “elite” affiliates upset that he’s not putting in enough “Kool-Aid” (high-rep OLY lifting, kipping pull-ups, WODs which make no sense) into the juice?

(Yes, that’s a bit of a generalization. But lets not delude ourselves into thinking that that’s NOT what a vast majority of people feel embodies the CrossFit brand).

I don’t get it. There are some things I like about CrossFit, and I’d be remiss not to tip my hat to them for helping to get people excited to move.

But I have to say: this elitist, holier-than-thou attitude doesn’t do it any favors.

This topic led to a ton of great dialogue on my Facebook page, and since the whole impetus behind it was assessment I wanted to share a link someone else posted which I feel points the conversation/debate in the right direction.

Can FMS and CrossFit Coexist? – Gray Cook and Kelly Starrett

If you have fifteen minutes to spare I HIGHLY recommend watching it.  Two brilliant guys talking shop. What’s not to like?

10 Must-Do’s For Mass – Bryan Krahn

Bryan has over 20 years experience in this field – both as a lifter and writer – and it’s uncanny how often I find myself nodding in agreement whenever I read some of his articles.

Guys like to make things more complicated than they have to be.  Adding mass doesn’t entail following some advance algorithm that would confuse a NASA scientist.  It doesn’t require some super secret, Eastern-Bloc periodization protocol you had translated from some Russian textbook. And it certainly doesn’t entail any deer antler powder.  Is that trend over yet by the way?

What it DOES require is some common sense and accountability.

Superhuman Strength – Artemis Scantalides

“You can’t rush strength.”  And in this article, Artemis explains why.

CategoriesUncategorized

There’s a Time and Place For Everything. Kettlebells Included.

I like to consider myself as an even keeled person who tries to see the comedy in life and not to take things too seriously.

I’m originally from Middle of Nowhere, NY where I grew up in a small town with no traffic lights and no fast food restaurants.  Just to be clear though, yes, we had running water. And the internet for that matter. But barely.  My parents had been using a dial-up connection up until last year, which is considered child abuse in some states.

Love you mom!!!!!

Anyways, life moves a bit differently where I’m from.  Where I’m from people don’t slam on their car horn and go bat shit crazy if you don’t move within one-hundredths of a nanosecond of a red light turning green. Here in the city?  Different story.  Everyone is the most important person in the world, and is apparently in some dire emergency to get somewhere.

Likewise, there aren’t many things that really bother me.  Okay sure, some people can go out of their way to be “kinda douchy” and do something really irritating like talking, going to Maroon 5 concerts, or taking up two parking spots and blocking me in.

Hey dude: this isn’t Dukes of Hazzard, and I don’t drive the General Lee, so I shouldn’t have to do a window stunt just to get into my own car. Capiche?

But those are usually few and far between.

The internet, though:  now THAT’S a whole new ball game, and a place where my pet peeves seem to increase exponentially.

Given the safe domain – not to mention the anonymity – that the internet provides, it’s not surprising how it often brings out the “inner expert” in people.

And why not?  One of the advantages of the internet is the profound profoundness of it all.  Never has information been so easily accessible. And never has there been a time where people can learn everything on anything with just a simple click of a button.

Which is also it’s drawback.

Just yesterday I read an article over on Livestrong.com by a buddy of mine who described a brief, albeit effective, metabolic type workout that could easily be followed by the masses and maybe provide a nice change of pace to someone looking to shed a little fat.

As is the case with any “universal” article geared towards the general public, it had to be watered down to the lowest common denominator so that the information could be easily followed. It was a slideshow piece which provided still-frame pictures (and descriptions) of each exercise.

For those interested, go HERE.

Apparently PJ (the author) made the mistake of using dumbbells in his pictures – which makes sense given that the majority of people out there don’t have access to kettlebells.

I thought it was great and provided a solid routine for a lot of people reading.

But wouldn’t you know it, the first comment – as well as a few others that followed – were from the kettlebell nazis, trying to convey to the world that kettlebells are the only form of exercise everyone should be doing.  EVER.

The very first comment:

The swing is a great exercise………when performed CORRECTLY…….WITH A KETTLEBELL! Do not use a dumbell as it is a different and less effective move and more likely to recruit the low back for power production.

The same person, then finished with these great words of wisdom:

nice technique………..NOT!

For starters:  it’s a freakin STILL FRAME picture.  Lets get off our high horse for a second.  How can you judge one’s overall technique by one still frame shot?

Here’s a picture of Jim Wendler squatting:

Using the same logic, we could argue that his squat technique sucks because he’s not hitting at least parallel.  We all know this is bullshit, because this is a STILL FRAME shot of him either descending or coming out of the hole during a max effort attempt.

Going back to the article, I have full confidence that a dude who trains HUNDREDS of people a month, has been published in several reputable magazines, and not to mention has a pretty smart editor at Livetrong who’s job it is to make sure that high quality content makes it to the site – knows how to perform a proper swing.

Relax.  Deep Breaths.  The World Won’t End.

Secondly, while I won’t argue that using a kettlebell over a dumbbell “feels” better when performing a swing, as I noted above, not everyone has access to kettlebells in their gym.  Using a dumbbell is fine.

No, really.  It is.

And since when does a dumbbell recruit more of the lower back?  I have a hard time figuring this one out.  If one is performing a proper swing pattern, snapping their hips, “attacking their groin,” and keeping the weight close to the body, I don’t see how if someone uses a dumbbell that it’s somehow is more detrimental to the back.

Further down the comments section, there are several other readers who state that the same workout is, like, waaaaaaay more effective if done with kettlebells.

Kettlebell squats are better than dumbbell squats.  Kettlebell rows are better than barbell rows. Kettlebell swings cure cancer. Kettlebells make the best salt and pepper shakers!!

Okay, I get it already:  you like kettlebells.

And that’s cool.  I do, too.  I consider coaches like Pavel, Dan John, Mike Mahler, and Gray Cook (all of whom are “kettlebell guys) mentors. Moreover, I have a high respect for people like Neghar Fonooni, Jen Sinkler, Steve Cotter, and Batman (I think) – all of whom utilize kettlebells to a high degree as well.

I use them myself – heck, I’m even contemplating going for my HKC.  I use them with all of my athletes and clients.  But as with anything else, and I think all the peeps I mentioned above would agree – whether we’re talking about  kettlebells, TRX, yoga, deadlifts, or anything else you want to throw into the mix – they’re a tool in the toolbox, and need to be used at the right time, with the right person, for the right job.

People are entitled to their opinion, of course. Everyone shouldn’t have to sing Kumbaya and hold hands on everything, and I think it’s great when people from different view points can have a civil discussion – even if all they do is agree to disagree.

But I just get flabbergasted (yep, that’s right: flabbergasted) when people go on and on and on and on and on*about how kettlebells are the shiznit (and they can be) and have to be used for E.V.E.R.Y.T.H.I.N.G. That’s not necessarily the case.

End rant, exit stage left.

Anyone agree?  Disagree?  Am I off base?

 

* = and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.  You get the idea.

CategoriesUncategorized

Thomas Test: Hip to Be Square Part II

Yesterday I went into a little detail on the Thomas Test and how it can be a very effective test to assess hip flexor length.  Unfortunately, while it’s a fairly idiot proof test to administer, many fitness professionals out there perform it incorrectly and have no clue on how to interpret what they find.  In case you missed it, CLICK HERE to read part one.

Today, however, I want to switch gears and talk a little about some of the corrective strategies one can implement after having completed the Thomas Test.   Come on, you didn’t think I was just gonna leave you hanging like that did you?

Predictably, as I noted yesterday, pretty much everyone has a little sumthin, sumthin going on in their hip flexors, whether we’re talking poor tissue quality and/or limited length – no big surprises there.  We sit…. a lot.  We sit on our commute to work.  We sit at work.  We sit on our way home from work.  We then sit some more at home.  And, for most, we even sit while we “workout,” if you want to call it that.   It’s no wonder our hip flexors are tighter than a crowbar!

But this is where the waters get a little murky and people start to miss the boat entirely.   Simply put, while many are quick to just throw in a few mundane stretches into the mix – if they’re even stretching at all – it takes a little bit more than that to alleviate the problem.

As such, here’s the basic formula I like to use:  release, stretch that mofo, then activate/mobilize.

Does the order matter?  In my opinion, absolutely!  When dealing with soft tissue restrictions, it’s important to break up any trigger points, adhesions or scar tissue first, because you can stretch till you’re blue in the face but you’re never going to get full extensibility/length of a muscle if it’s nothing but one massive knot in the first place.

Likewise, while it can be argued whether or not prolonged stretching actually stretches the muscle or just increase our tolerance to a stretch, the fact of the matter remails – it’s better than nothing; and, it undoubtedly makes people feel better afterwards.  in addition, lenghtening the muscle allows us to “use” the new range of motion.  It’s a win-win.

Don’t ne a Jonny Raincloud – just do it!

And finally, it makes sense that once any triggers points or knots are taken care of, we need to mobilize and/or activate the muscle to help engrain/cement the new ROM we’ve established.

Rectus Femoris:

In terms of self myfascial release, you need a foam roller.  if you don’t have one, get one.  They’re only $10 and there’s really no exciuse not to have one.  No, really.

Having said that, the video below is a great place to start.  While it demonstrates our entire foam rolling series, you can easily see how we hit the anterior surface of the thigh, which is where the RF is located.

From there, a few of my favorite exercises to mobilize the area are the yoga plex, and the wall hip flexor mobilization.

Perform 8-10 repetitions on each leg and you should be good to go.  Just be cognizant NOT to hyper-extend your lower back while doing these.

In much the same light as the video above, when discussing the topic of stretching, it’s important to recognize that the RF crosses TWO joints (the hip and knee) and we need to take that into consideration.   To that end, I really like the kneeling heel-to-butt stretch.   Simply kneel on the floor, placing one foot behind you on a bench.  From there, one important cue I like to give people is to squeeze the glute on the same side that’s kneeling.  This “co-contraction” of the glute will posteriorly tilt the pelvis and allow for a more intense stretch of the RF.  Hold for 30-60 seconds and switch to the other leg.

Psoas

The psoas is a bit tricker to get to in terms of SMR work, and as such, calls for modalities that are a bit more aggressive.  Since the foam roller is virtrually useless in this case, I like to defer to the Thera Cane instead.  Lie on your back with one leg flexed to 90 degrees.  From here, I like to cue people to perform a teeny tiny crunch and feel for the lateral aspect of their rectus abdominus; then relax.  Where you feel the muscle relax is where you want to “dig” the knob of the cane into.  Hold it in place, and SLOWLY extend your leg until it’s completely straight.   Try not to cry.

Essentially what you’re doing is a poor man’s version of Active Release Therapy, and to say that it’s a tad bit uncomfortable would be an understatement.  Put another way: it f#@cking sucks, and I won’t think any less of you if you have to grab a Kleenex.

Perform 3-5 total passes on each side.  Told ya, not fun.

In terms of activating the psoas, I like to use two exercise.  The first is one that I got from Mike Boyle called the Seated Psoas Activation.  Because the psoas is the one hip flexor that’s active above 90 degrees of hip flexion, it’s important that you find a low enough box to perform this exercise effectively.

All you’re going to do here is sit on the box with your back flush against a wall (so that you can’t lean back and cheat).  Raise you foot off the ground and hold for 10-15 seconds.  Lower it back to the ground and repeat the same sequence on the opposite side.  Don’t be surprised if you can’t raise you’re foot that high – really, all we’re looking for are a couple of inches.

Another exercise I like is the lying psoas band march.  Here, you’re going to lie supine (on your back) with a light band wrapped around both feet.  Bring both knees up to 90 degrees of hip flexion and then extend ONE leg, keeping the other stationary at 90 degrees.  The psoas is forced to fire by resisting the pull of the band (and staying above 90 degrees).  Peform 8-10 repetitions on one side, then switch.

As far as dedicated stretches, I like the feet elevated warrior lunge stretch.  Here, I like to note a few things:

1.  You’re going to place one foot on a slight elevation (8-12 inches).

2.  The leg that’s extended behind you is the side you’re stretching – much like the heel-to-butt stretch, be sure to squeeze the glute of that same side to posteriorly tilt the pelvis, which in turn, will elicit a more intense stretch.

3.  Too, you want to reach up towards the ceiling with your arm and lean slightly in the opposite direction.  So, if you’re right leg is extending behind you, you’ll reach up with your right hand and then lean slightly to the left.  In all, it should look something like this:

Hold for a 30-60 second count and repeat on the opposite side.

TFL:

Okay, here’s the deal.  In the process of writing this blog post, I accidentally deleted the ENTIRE thing and had to start from scratch.

FML!!!!

AFter throwing my face through a wall, I wrote the entire thing again (not quite as awesome as the first go round), and now I’m short on time, and the TFL is getting the shaft. Sorry.

Maybe I’ll throw a little tidbit in tomorrow, but for now, I really need to go lift something heavy to get this pent up aggression out.  Hope this helps, and if anyone has anything to share, please feel free below!

CategoriesUncategorized

Thomas Test: Hip to Be Square Part I

Not surprisingly, when it comes to assessment, there are many school’s of thought.  During our staff in-service the other day, Eric made a great point in saying that most assessments are very general to start and then move into more specific things as you dig a little deeper.  For instance, in his book Movement, Gray Cook notes that the Functional Movement Screen hits on seven key movement patterns:

Deep Squat Movement Pattern
Hurdle Step Movement Pattern
Inline Lunge Movement Pattern
Shoulder Mobility Movement Pattern
Active Straight-Leg Raise Movement Pattern
Trunk Stability Push-Up Movement Pattern, and
Rotatry Stability Movement Pattern

All the above are very general and do a supberb job at assessing movement quality, addressing assymetries, and just covering our bases.

Conversely, Cook also has what he calls the Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA), which, unlike the FMS, has many “breakout” (more specific) assessments depending on what you find.

As an example, Lower Body Extension can be broken down to:  standing hip extension, prone active hip extension, prone passive hip extension, FABER test, and the Thomas Test.

Not always, but because of the population we deal with at Cressey Peformance (baseball players), we start with more specific tests (testing GIRD, lead leg ROM, ect) and then go into more general things.

One test that seems universal, however, is the Thomas Test.  Named after Dr. Hugh Owen Thomas (thank you Wikipedia), this test is a great assessment tool to better ascertain hip flexor length (or lack thereof).

Here’s the deal, though.   As simple as this test is, many fitness professionals have no clue how to perform it correctly, let alone interpret the results.  Here, I’m going to try my best to break it down and hopefully clear up some of the confusion, and maybe drop some knowledge bombs along the way.

Starting Position:  Seated at the end of the table, with the thighs half off the table.

**This is an important point, because the body position shifts as the subject lies down and brings his or her knee toward their chest.  The end position for the start of the testing is with the other knee just at the edge of the table so that the knee is free to flex and the thigh is full length of the table.

From there, simply hold your thigh, pulling your knee towards the chest, only enough to flatten the low back and sacrum on the table.

In an ideal world, I like to hold down the pelvis – on the testing side – to allow a little more posterior tilt.  Many people will go into excessive lumbar extension, which will give the illusion of having ample hip flexor length.  By holding the pelvis down, they can’t cheat.

Conversely, in Muscles: Testing and Function With Posture and Pain, Kendall recommends NOT to bring both knees to the chest because it does allow excessive posterior tilt which can skew the results towards apparent (not actual) hip flexor shortness.

In the end, use your own discretion.  For those of you reading who are coaches or personal trainers, I prefer the “bring one leg towards the chest, pin the pelvis down approach.”  If performing this alone, I prefer the “two knees to the chest, lower one leg approach.”

Anyhoo

So, what now?  As noted above, the Thomas Test is a great test to assess hip flexor length – namely the rectus femoris, psoas, and TFL.

Testing:  With the low back and sacrum flat on the table, a “passing test” will show that the posterior thigh touches the table, and the knee passively flexes – to approximately 80 degrees.

Almost always, you’ll rarely (if ever) come across a perfect Thomas Test.  We’re a very sedentary society, and it’s no surprise that pretty much everyone has poor hip flexor length.

One thing to consider, however (especially if you’re dealing with a well-trained individual), is the size of one’s hamstrings.  Dudes (and girls, too) who have well developed hamstrings will seemingly “fail” this test because the posterior thigh does not touch the table.  So, it’s not so much they have short hip flexors (which still could be the case), but rather, they have hamstrings the size of Kansas that prevents the thigh from coming down flush to the table.

Ruling this out, if the thigh does come off the table, we can rule out the rectus femoris by simply extending the lower leg.  Since the RF crosses both the hip and knee joint, if we extend the leg and the thigh then touches the table – viola – you found your culprit.

On the flipside, if you extend the lower leg, and the thigh still stays off the table, you can assume it’s the psoas that’s short and/or stiff.

In terms of the TFL, we don’t need to get too detailed here.  Some trainers like to get all geeky and bust out their protractors and Bunsen Burners and measure every degree.  I have my limits and just prefer to keep the assessment flowing.  If there’s an issue with the TFL, I’ll note any lateral deviation of the thigh from the midline of the body and move on with my life.

And that, ladies and gentlemen is the Thomas Test – in a nutshell……..more or less.  Tomorrow, in part II, I’ll discuss a handful of correcive strategies you can implement to help fix some of the issues you may have come across.  Till then, stay sexy.