I firmly believe static stretching is often over-prescribed; an easy default recommendation for some fitness professionals too lazy to dig a little deeper.
“Tight” hamstrings? Go stretch those bad boys.
“Tight” hip flexors? Better go stretch!
Bad hair day? Yup, you need to stretch.
SPOILER ALERT: 👇👇 this is not the correct way to stretch your hip flexors.
The “Real” vs. “BS” Hip Flexor Stretch
I don’t feel static stretching is a complete waste of time mind you.
Sometimes (<– key word, sometimes) it plays a crucial role in helping people get out of pain and addressing varying muscular imbalances or postural issues.
SIDE NOTE: Most people don’t realize that what we deem as “stretching” isn’t really doing what we think it’s doing. In order for a muscle to really gain length you need to increase the number of sarcomeres in a series. This takes a…………..metric………..fuck………ton…………of……………………………………………….time.
I could be out-dated in my research vernacular, but I believe it takes upwards of 20-60+ minutes of holding a continuous stretch to actually increase it’s length to any degree.
What most of use are doing when we drop down to the floor to stretch something for 30-seconds is increasing our tolerance to the stretch.
And even if static stretching is deemed necessary, none of this takes into account the most important – albeit most overlooked – detail.
Performing it correctly.
Take the hip flexors for example. Everyone loves stretching their hip flexors.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Thing is: You’ll rarely see someone do it right. Instead, despite endless efforts – sometimes to the tune of weeks, months, and years of “stretching” – nothing ever changes.
Many people will still point to the same area that feels “tight.”
I’m by no means the first person to point this out: guys like Mike Reinold, Mike Robertson, Dr. Evan Osar, and Cobra Commander have been pointing this out for years.
SIDE NOTE #2: I’m actually more inclined to toss in some dedicated hip flexor STRENGTHENING exercises in lieu of stretching (but that’s for another time).
So lets take a look at how to properly stretch the hip flexors, shall we?
The whole BS notion that muscle confusion is a “thing.”5
And Those Things That are Important. But Really Only Kinda-Sorta Important. Actually, We’re All Just a Bunch of A-Holes Who Like to Argue Over the Internet
Exercise selection
Exercise order
Exercise technique
Goal(s). Powerlifting vs. bodybuilding vs. OLY lifting vs. CrossFit vs. Fat Loss vs. Mechagodzilla
Training history/age
Past and current injury history
Ideal number of sets/reps
Time of day to workout
Length of workout
Best exercises to make your pecs cut diamonds
[EPIC drum roll is still cued]
Facetious tone aside, allof the things mentioned above are important and play an important role in program design.
However, there’s one metric that seems to always get overlooked.
And that is…..
Attendance
“The most important metric of a training program’s success is…attendance. People need to show up”
You can write the most baller scientifically-based program addressing all the criteria listed above that’s based off block periodization with meticulous percentages written in, laminated with Vladimir Zatsiorsky’s6 chest hair, and none of it will matter if people don’t show up.
Make no mistake…getting people to “show up” is a skill in of itself.
Of course, the monetary commitment to hire a personal trainer or coach is enough to motivate most people to “show up.” But even then it’s often a crap-shoot, let alone entices someone to invest their time (and in themselves) long-term.
There are numerous, outside-the-box factors that often come into play:
The ability to listen to and validate someone. Are you a trainer/coach who likes to “win” or prove to everyone how smart you are and how you’re always right? Better, less uppity communication skills can have a profound impact on your sales and retention as a trainer/fitness business.7
It’s not about you. It’s about THEM. Get your clients to talk about themselves.8
Take the time to introduce your clients to one another. Maybe you have two clients who really enjoy squatting or, I don’t know, old-school Jean-Claude Van Damme movies. Either way, introducing client A to client B often helps build camaraderie and community.
With regards to program design: It’s not necessarily about choosing the best exercise possible to entertain people. Rather, it’s about choosing the most appropriate exercise(s) to better set people up for immediate and long-term success. These are really boring.
“Think trainer, speak client.”9You in your head: “Dan is really crushing his posterior Mediastinum on those squats.” You to Dan: “don’t arch so much in your lower back.”
Design for your space. You don’t always need all the bells and whistles to impress people. Audit your equipment. Almost always, the less you have, the better your programs will be. Most people don’t need as much variety as they think they need anyways.
Strive to make your clients autonomous.
Play more Wu-Tang. Just, because.
This is by no means an exhaustive list, but I do feel serves as a delicious amuse bouche in helping fitness professionals understand that it’s not always about credentials, certifications, and deadlifts.
Getting people to show up via other means is often the key to effective program writing.
It’s seems counterintuitive, maybe even borderline asinine, not to guarantee your clients results, right? I mean, what the hell are they hiring you for?
HINT: It’s not to trade baseball cards or tickle fights.
I had a new client start with me recently and within ten minutes of her initial assessment she was relaying a story of her previous coach telling her she’d see results in “x” weeks.
I don’t know about you, but I’d hate to set myself up for that kind of standard or expectation as a coach. Unless their goals are any of the following….
Cut diamonds with their pecs.
Build a deadlift that shakes the ground all the way down in Kentucky.
Become a world class hugger.
…I’m not guaranteeing anything, let alone within a specific window of time.
When a new person shows up to CORE I have zero insight into their work ethic, degree of compliance, or any other outside factors that may or may not come into play (family responsibilities, work schedule, Andor marathon watching schedule).
Don’t get me wrong: There should always be an open dialogue and some form of communication with regards to goal setting. But don’t set yourself (or your client) up for a trap by guaranteeing results.
So, Uh, Since We’re Talking About Goals
It behooves any coach to encourage their client to be more specific with their goal setting. Having realistic and tangible goals in sight helps nudge more intent and purpose.
It keeps people more invested in their training.
Just be careful of someone being too vague (“I want to lose weight”), unrealistic (“I want to add 100 lbs to my deadlift in two weeks”), or downright batshit crazy (“I want to pet a Unicorn”).
Lets us a too vague example.
Too Vague = “I want to lose weight” or “I want to get stronger.”
Neither is a bad goal. They’re just both vague as shit. It’s like me saying something to the effect of “I want food” when asked what I am in the mood for for dinner.
When someone suggests a vague goal like the ones above I’ll usually try to dig a bit deeper:
“Why do you want to lose weight/get stronger?”
“What’s prevented you from achieving those goals in the past?”
“How will attaining those goals make you feel once you hit them?”
Peeling back the onion with follow-up questions reveals quite a bit. The person soon understands they need to switch gears and latch onto something more concrete.
Which serves as a nice segue to…
Try to Encourage More Performance Based Goals
I’ve been a champion of this approach for a number of years now.
Setting performance-based goals is a game changer.
For example, with many of my female clients, instead of allowing them to default to the “I want to lose weight” trope, I’ll encourage them to pick a performance-based goal to train towards instead:
Perform their first strict, unassisted chin-up
Deadlift their bodyweight for five reps
Perform ten, strict pushups from the floor.
Beat Wonder Woman in a fist-fight.
Setting a performance-based goal makes things so much clearer from a programming standpoint. First off, it makes getting rid of the superfluous foo-foo bullshit easier. Secondly, and most important, is that it gives people purpose in their training.
There’s a WHY behind the madness.
Each exercise, exercise order, load, set/rep, and rest period is curated for the sole purpose of hitting that goal.
To steal a famous quote from strength coach, Dan John:
“The goal is to keep the goal, the goal.”
Either your training program is bringing you one step closer to hitting your goal, or…it’s not.
What I find, more often than not, is when I can get a client to marry him or herself to training for a performance-based goal, the work and effort involved often results in them hitting that aesthetic goal anyways.
It’s a win-win.
The dose of empowerment is priceless.
Set Up Process Goals
This is so simple it’s absurd.
Basically, process goals are smaller, more bite-sized, DAILY, goals people should try to hit that will compliment their ability to hit “big rock” training goals.
I mean, how “strong” is someone going to get if they’re routinely only getting 4-5 hours of sleep a night? What are the chances someone is going to “lose weight” if their idea of a veggie is a piece of lettuce on top of their double bacon cheeseburger?
Setting up 2-3 process goals – getting at least seven hours of sleep a night, shooting for 3-4 servings of vegetables per day, eating out less – for people to strive for every day is a great way to not only keep them on task, but provide an unparalleled sense of accomplishment as well.
As they check off hitting each goal per day, they gain more and more confidence and sense of “holy shit, I can do this.”
Build Autonomy, Competency, and Relatedness
These are just fancy-schmancy ways of saying people want to have a sense of freedom/choice in their training, they want to feel like they can do shit, and they want to be part of a community.10
Autonomy: People don’t like to be told what to do. When someone is told what to do or not to do, the human response is something called reactance.
They revolt. Go against the grain. Tell you to go fuck yourself.
Basically, they do whatever it is you told them not to do anyway.
Admittedly, when someone is paying you to be their coach, there’s a degree of “do what I tell you to do” that comes with territory.
However, I’d encourage any coach or trainer to build a level of CHOICE into their programming.
Maybe your client gets to choose what variation of deadlift they perform that day.
Maybe you let them choose if they want to use dumbbells or kettlebells for certain movements.
Maybe you give them a 5-10 minute window at the end of their session to do some additional glute training.
That sense of freedom/autonomy will undoubtedly build a greater degree of compliance.
Competency: This is easy. People don’t like to fail. I’d argue failing is good and part of the growing process, but that’s besides the point.
People want to feel like they can DO stuff. For example, if someone has little experience strength training, what’s the likelihood they’re going to feel great about barbell back squatting on Day #1.
Now, I’m not saying a good coach can’t teach someone how to back squat in a matter of minutes.
It’s very doable.
However, what I am saying is don’t be a dickhead. It can be intimidating for some people to place a barbell on their back, and you’re not doing them any favors by force-feeding it.
I feel the squat is a valuable pattern everyone should become competent with. That doesn’t mean everyone has to start with a barbell on their back.
Goblet squats are a splendid starting point for many people. Once they’re comfortable with that, we can progress accordingly.
Relatedness: Keeping this one brief, going out of your way to build a culture where people are surrounded by like-minded individuals and they can be themselves is paramount.
Don’t Be Scared to Dish Out Some Tough Love
Bringing this whole discussion full-circle: Remember that new client I mentioned above, the one who told me her previous trainer guaranteed her results?
She asked me an obvious question:
“When do you think I will see results?”
My response:
“If you kinda-sorta train, you’ll get kinda-sorta results.”
This was a (maybe not so subtle) hint that it’s up to HER.
You get out of training what you put into it.
As someone’s coach I’ll be there to support them and help augment their training experience. However, it’s also important to relay the message that part of the onus on them, too.
There was time in my blogging career where I’d be more apt to dedicate writing energy toward topics like “Top 5 Carrie Bradshaw Breakups” than anything related to business, let alone taxes.
However, a major mishap I made back in 2007 when I transitioned to being self-employed made me change my tune quickly.
Let’s just say I needed a new pair of pants when I realized I owed the IRS a lot of money because I didn’t properly prepare for things beforehand.
I get it. It’s not lost on me that most fitness pros reading would rather me write about assessment or how to turn people into deadlifting T-1000’s. I do plenty of that. Today’s post, though – courtesy of fitness business expert Billy Hofacker – is what most fitness professionals NEED to be ingesting.
I hope it helps (it totally will).
5 Things Fitness Professionals Need to Consider When It Comes to Taxes
Most fit pros are afraid of taxes. They can be scary, especially if you don’t understand some basics. Not keeping up with and paying your taxes can get you into trouble.
Here is some good news.
With some basic information and planning, you can avoid some pretty unpleasant traps. Also, while nobody likes paying them, owing for taxes means you are making money! Besides, if you work independently as a coach, you get to dress more comfortably for work than many of your peers!
If you have employees, you need to deposit a certain amount withheld from them for taxes or you could be in trouble. If you have products you sell and use the sales tax money for other things, you won’t make it.
As a general rule, you’ll want to set aside a percentage of your profit into a separate savings account so you can pay quarterly estimates to the IRS. Without getting too sophisticated and if you don’t have historical data from your business to look at, 25% is a good place to start.
For example, if you are going to pay yourself $1,000 from your business, take $250 and deposit it into your tax savings account and the remaining $750 would go to you.
In my early days as an independent trainer I neglected to do this. I accumulated a six thousand dollar liability with the IRS and had to pay it off over the following 2 years while building my career. That was over a decade ago. Since then, by incorporating this strategy of withholding taxes on myself, I have not had the tax man after me since!
Note From TG: I’m a huge proponent of the Profit First approach to running your business. When I left Cressey Sports Performance in 2015 to begin my own venture in Boston I immediately adopted this system and have been thriving off it since. Having a set plan to know where your money is going at the end of each month to plan for things like taxes, business expenses, and PAYING YOURSELF is crucial. I can’t recommend the book enough. I’m also way more jacked now than I was then. Coincidence?
The above scenario applies to you if you are taxed as a Schedule C or partnership. You will have to pay quarterly estimates to the IRS for income tax. If you are taxed as an S-corp, you pay payroll taxes on any salaries paid to employees, including you.
As an S-corp, you can pay the amount of taxes needed through the payroll taxes in order to cover any tax liability. This helps ensure you are always up to speed with your tax payments and hopefully it’s an example of “out of sight, out of mind.”
I personally use that method and it has taken away my tax stress.
Finally, when you have some actual historical data, like previous personal and business tax returns, you can work with your accountant to determine the percentage of revenue that goes to taxes. You can also determine, with your accountant11, what the estimated tax responsibility for your business will be and turn that into a percentage of revenue.
You can then transfer that amount into a tax savings account every two weeks or so and use those funds to either pay your estimates (e.g. Schedule C) or reimburse yourself for the taxes the business paid (e.g. S-Corp).
The important thing to remember is that regardless of how your business is structured, you pay taxes on profit and not profit distributions.
For that reason, you will want to be sure to…
1. Keep Good Records
Hopefully, you’re not just handing your accountant a shoe box full of receipts at the end of the year. I used to know someone who did that.:)
In all seriousness, paper receipts for deductible items are fine but you may want to keep digital copies as well just to be safe. Taking pictures, scanning them, or using one of the many receipt/expense apps works. Other than that you’ll want to keep good records of what’s coming in (income) and what’s going out (expenses).
Other than staying organized for taxes, this will help you stay focused on how much you’re making.
2. Bookkeeping
Do you know the difference between credits and debits? Assets vs. liabilities? While it’s probably not why you got into a fitness career, some bookkeeping basics will serve you well.
Even if you’re not ready to take a college level accounting course, you might want to look into accounting software. Besides helping you prepare for taxes, you can keep track of invoices and billing, as well as run financial reports to help guide you.
Then when tax time comes, you’ll have things organized and an efficient way to access your income and expense history.
Finally, as you grow in your career, it’s wise to evaluate the best uses of your time. While in the beginning, it may make sense to do everything yourself, at some point it may make more sense to hire a professional bookkeeper so you know things are done correctly and you can focus on your highest value priorities.
Just like any area, there are good bookkeepers and not so good ones. I know from experience. If you go that route, be sure to hire someone who understands at least basic accounting and how financial statements flow together.
3. Know What You Can Deduct
A smart and wealthy client advised me early on to take any ethical deduction possible. Some of the bigger potential items to look at are travel, home office (Schedule C and Partnerships), and health insurance. Self-employed individuals can take some deductions “above the line.”
This means they can still take the standard deduction while also writing off some more items.
It’s important to know here that you can take a standard (flat) deduction or itemize all your deductions based on your expenses. Most Fit Pros will take the standard deduction route since it’s easiest but if you have a lot of expenses it may make more sense to itemize.
Do your homework and know what’s best for you.
4. Take Care of Your Future Self
People who work for big companies generally have an employer who sets up a retirement plan for them. Oftentimes, they get a company match. Since you may not have either of these luxuries, you’ll need to develop the discipline to take a portion of your income and set it aside for your big, beautiful future.
With that said, there are some benefits here when it comes to tax season.
A self-employed individual can contribute up to 25 percent of net earnings, to a max of $61,000 in 2022, to a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA. Additionally, up to $14,000 can be contributed to a SIMPLE IRA. Those IRA contributions, which are above the line, may be tax deductable.
5. Where’s All My Money?
Fit pros are often confused when the end of the year comes and they owe taxes but don’t have the money to show for it. I hear comments like, “How can I be taxed?” I don’t have any money.
They simply don’t know what they don’t know.
There is a major difference between profit and net cash. I highly encourage you to track your profit but be equally diligent about tracking your “net cash.”
Net cash is used to see how much cash is left after expenses and owner’s distributions. Since owner’s distributions don’t count as “expenses,” they can cause a Fit pro to think they are doing better than they are. This is one of the biggest misunderstood things for fitness business owners
The #1 rule in business is not to run out of cash! With a plan for preparing for taxes and an understanding of cash flow, you’ll be on your way to making a massive impact AND creating a career you love.
About the Author
Billy Hofacker has been a personal trainer for over 20 years and is owner and CEO of Total Body Boot Camp and Performance Center in the hyper competitive market of Long Island, NY.
Billy is now passionate about helping fitness professionals become financially fit.
He is the author of Fitness Profits as well the host of the leading financial podcast for fit pros, Your Fitness Money Coach Podcast.
You can book a free 15 minute Q&A call with him here. During that call, you can discuss and financial challenges to see if a personalized plan might be a good fit.
A few years ago, while presenting at the NSCA Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference, I mentioned to the crowd that I don’t work with a lot of athletes anymore.
By choice.
Training Athletes vs. General Population Clients
Instead, I explained that currently 90-95% of my clientele are made up of general population clients.
You know, “normal” people.
What’s more, I noted that I actually preferred training them over professional athletes.
There was a cacophony of crickets chirping and cold, blank stares. You would have thought I had just told the crowd I had given up everything just so that I could go walk the land and practice kung-fu.
During the subsequent Q&A later that day I had a handful of people approach to ask if I was okay and whether or not I needed medical attention for saying something so blasphemous me to further elaborate my comment from earlier:
“So, uh, you said you stopped training athletes to work with general population clients.
Like, why?”
Here’s What I Said
Before I peel back that onion, I think it’s important to address the elephant in the room.
I think the overlying credo in the fitness industry is that once you get to the point where you’re working with (professional) athletes or celebrities you’ve somehow “made it.”
Quick Aside:I also feel there’s a tendency for people within the industry to give more credence or credibility to certain certifications over others. For example if someone is a CSCS (Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist) they’re obviously smarter and more qualified than a lowly CPT (Certified Personal Trainer)….and they can probably walk on water.13
Certifications are great and all (and necessary to some degree), but I guess I fall into the camp that tries not to place too much weight on the letters next to someone’s name, and more so on their experience and overall track record.
I get it: Training Gary from accounting doesn’t attach itself to as much prestige and luster as, say, an NFL player or Zac Efron.
However, as my friend and colleague, Mike Connelly, eloquently stated back in the day:
“We all train people. Whether or not they get paid to play a sport does not change their “peopleness” nor does it impact your status as an elite trainer. You either know what you’re doing or you don’t and there is plenty of both on either side.“
Training professional athletes and actors has its benefits and setbacks, as does training general population clients.
I’ve been fortunate to work with people on both sides of the fence.
I can tell you that throughout my career I’ve been every bit as excited watching one of my female clients nail her first strict, bodyweight chin-up as when I was watching an athlete of mine make his Major League debut.
Fun Tony Factoid: I watched one of my former athletes make his Big League debut the night of my Bachelor party.
Anyways, far be it from me to tell you which is the better fit or more rewarding route to take.
All I can do is speak for myself.
Speaking of which, how about I finally STFU and get to the meat and potatoes of the post.
“Tony, why did you CHOOSE to not work with pro athletes?”
Here’s What I Actually Said
1. You’re not my Mom, you can’t tell me what to do.
2. The truth is I still do train athletes. My previous coaching position was at an institution – Cressey Sports Performance – which is known for working with a metric boat load of professional athletes.
Especially overhead athletes.
So, in effect, me switching gears and not training (professional) athletes at the same abundance was very much a result of that.
I simply am not around them as much compared to the past.
Rest assured, though, if Mike Trout wanted to train at CORE I wouldn’t turn him away….;o)
3. When I decided to leave CSP and open up my own small studio in Boston I knew the demographic I’d be catering to the most would be normal, everyday, all-I-want-to-do-is-to-be-able-to-pick-my-kid-up-and-not-hate-life people.
Partly because of the location of my studio, and partly because that’s what I wanted to do.
Don’t get me wrong: I loved working with athletes – and I still do.
However, as far as absolute joys in my life are concerned, outside of a good tickle fight, a heaping bowl of ice-cream, or rough-housing with my 5-year old, I have always gotten more out of helping “regular peeps” nail their first 2x bodyweight squat or helping someone finally conquer his or her’s chronic low-back pain.
I wanted to get back to formerand the joy it brought me.
So that’s what I did.
Bye Felicia.
Besides, I don’t feel there’s any less pedigree of coaching involved at accomplishing any of the things mentioned above compared to improving someone’s VO2 max or vertical jump from 31 to 32 inches.
In fact, this quote from Vince Gabriele sums things up nicely:
“I get more satisfaction helping a level 3 become a level 7, than a level 8 becoming a level 9. The former is so much more rewarding.“
4. Also, if I really wanted to be honest with any young fitness professionals reading:
There’s more general population clients out there in the world than there are professional athletes. It’s an inevitable mathematical likelihood that, despite how important you feel you are and that only the elite of the elite can (and should) be privy to your superior training methodologies, you may, never, work with professional athletes.
But if you do, training athletes can provide a level of prestige that can be leveraged to garner more business.14 That said, and I think a lot of gym owners will agree with this, it’s general population clients that pay the rent and often result in more consistent revenue.
Something to think about.
And That’s That
If anything I hope this little rant resonates with those who may struggle with the notion that they’re “less qualified” because they don’t work with athletes , models, actors, or clowns.
That’s a bunch of hogwash.
Maturity in a trainer/coach is revealed in ‘the process of progress’ rather than who’s connected to it.15
I’ve had a rash of fitness professionals reaching out of late asking the same question in varying iterations…
…a question, mind you, that I think every fitness professional ponders at some point:
When the hell is someone going to green-light a sequel to Over the Top?16
Okay, in all seriousness: the real question revolves around writing training programs. Specifically the process and how to do it(?).
Ready?
Here goes…
Writing training programs is a lot like foul shots.
You Do It, Then Do It Again, and Then Again
If you want to get better at hitting more foul shots in the 4th quarter…you practice taking foul shots.
Likewise:
If you want to get better at chess you play more chess.
If you want to get better playing a guitar you play more guitar.
If you want to get better at nunchuck skills you practice nunchucking.
If you want to get better at not getting laid you join a Lord of the Rings reenactment society.17
I know people reading want me to drum up some esoteric explanation of how to write programs, but really…
…that’s the secret.
You just do it.
And over time, by the mere math of it all, and the repeated exposure to the act, you have no other option but to get comfortable, better, and more competent with the process.
I mean, I can click on the folder affectionately titled “Making People Diesel” (<– I.e., the programs I write for my clients) and peruse thousands of programs.
This isn’t to say there hasn’t been a metric shit-ton of reading, studying, and watching a lot of really smart people talk about program design behind my madness.
There’s inevitably a “backbone” of knowledge that’s (constantly) being updated, expounded upon, experimented with, and altogether reconsidered from my vantage point.
That said, when it comes to writing effective training programs there’s nothing more poignant for me to offer other than to say…
“Write them…that’s how you get better at it.”
Moreover, I’ll be the first to admit I have never written a perfect program. I am constantly x’ing stuff out, changing this to that, and/or doing my best not to be an abject failure.
Stop thinking you HAVE to be perfect (<— which is a barrier I feel intimidates a lot of fit pros).
Have a plan, yes.
But be prepared to change something 100% of the time.
Let that sink in.
Coaching people is about adaptability. I am ALL for having a plan and some semblance of “order” to help someone from Point A to Point B.
However, life has an uncanny way, almost comedically so, of peppering us with monkey-wrenches, curveballs, and tomfoolery that can detail the best of plans.
Work happens. Lack of sleep happens. Shitty bosses who keep you late happen. Holidays happen. Kid’s explosive diarrhea happens.
Life happens.
And that often means switching gears.
Speaking personally, and given I work with predominately general pop clients – who’s schedules tend to be a bit more chaotic and unpredictable than that of a professional athlete – I’ll go off script often.
Every one of my clients gets an individualized program written for them based off their goals, injury/health history, and ability level.
I pride myself on that.
However, sometimes a client will show up late, or maybe will have a sore shoulder, or worse maybe feel like they crossed paths with a Targaryen when they arrive for their training session.
I’m not doing them any service by forcing them to hit that heavy deadlift triple because the program calls for it. As my colleague, Zach Even-Esh notes:
“Coaches get too caught up in the ‘We HAVE to do it, it’s on the program!’ Autoregulate. Adjust & adapt.”
In this scenario I’ll do what I like to call a WHITEBOARD WORKOUT.
Nothing fancy here.
I’ll just forego their actual program and write something up on the whiteboard instead.
I know in some circles I should spend a life sentence in Azkaban for doing something so blasphemous. I’d argue I’m being a good coach.
And since this is my website (and my blog) I’m totally right….;O)
And That’s That
I had someone chime in with following comment on Twitter:
“How do you silence the voice that says “if you keep changing things your clients will think you’ve no idea what you’re doing!”
Easy.
I turn my hat backwards and tell it to STFU. I change things under the guise I have their best interests in mind, and not my ego.
It’s not lost on me that the title of this particular blog post may ruffle a few feathers out there. There are many coaches and facilities in the world who implement the OLY lifts with their athletes and find great success with this approach.
Conversely, there are also many coaches and facilities in the world who d0 not use the OLY lifts18and as a result have been blacklisted from S&C Twitter get resounding results as well.
What follows is one coach’s (Syracuse, NY based strength & conditioning coach Ricky Kompf) opinion with a solid rationale for why he falls into the latter category above.
I hope you give it a read.
Why College Athletes Shouldn’t Use Olympic Lifts
First off I want to start this article off by saying Olympic lifts can be a great way to develop power.
(step away from the pitchforks, please)
This is in no way shape or form is a diatribe trying to bash Olympic lifts as a group of exercises. They are a tool and just like any tool in the weight room, they have their time and place.
And that time and place should not be in the college weight room as a main means of training power in their respective sport.
I see it every year, athletes who we have been working with for years in high school finally gain some respectable competency in the weight-room and reach the point where they can play their sport at the next level.
Their collegiate strength coach sends them their summer training program and there it is:
Hang cleans
Snatches
Power cleans
6 AM lifts
A little piece of me dies inside and I have to fight the urge not to go how and yell at my cats.
How can you except an athlete who you have never trained with or seen workout in person to execute the Olympic lifts correctly and effectively without your watchful eye? It then becomes our job to teach these lifts to the athletes which I’m happy to do, but it undoubtably takes away from the training due to the time and energy restraints it puts on our training.
To make things worse, when these athlete head off to college, train with these exercises as their key performance indicators and main source of power training, 9 times out of 10 they come back to our gym the next year weaker and many times slower.
I cannot fully contribute these exercises to the outcome, this is simply an observation I’ve noticed for years.
Here’s why I believe these lifts should not be apart of a college athlete’s training program and are actually causing a decrease in performance.
1. Competing Demands
The Olympic lifts are highly technical.
College athletes are arguably at the peak for their sport’s performance (or at least very close to it). That means the demand of skill in their sport takes up a large portion of their training…
…and rightfully so.
They are trying to reach mastery in their craft.
They are not Olympic weight lifters. They are team sport athletes and should be treated as such.
Learning and training with the Olympic lifts takes a high level of skill, skill that is learned through years and years of training and working at it. By spending the time required to be proficient at these exercises you will be taking away from the motor learning time and energy that could be used in their sport.
You can only master so much at one time from a motor learning perspective and choosing a highly technical form of exercise during collegiate years will only take away from this mastery.
2. They Won’t Be Good Enough For It To Be Effective
The Olympic lifts do a great job of enhancing powerful triple extension, but you don’t reach peak power until you reach about 80% of you max in an Olympic lift.
For the bulk of collegiate aged athletes who have little experience training with the OLY lifts, they likely won’t truly reach this level for a number of years because of how long it takes to master the skill.
(ideally, one would have started at the age of twelve with a PVC stick and ample time…not at 18 with USC at home next week).
I’d rather utilize an exercise like the Trap Bar Jump, which has a much lower learning curve yet yields comparable peak power production in a matter of minutes (not years).
This way I can develop strength, power and speed with as little amount of time as possible. As a result, the athlete can spend more energy on their sport while still experiencing the benefits of a strength & conditioning program.
An argument can be made that you could, over the course of the four years, systematically teach a college athlete how to perfect the Olympic lifts in order to reap their benefit.
However, in my experience most (not all) collegiate strength coaches incorporate these lifts using max loads and testing them as a key performance indicator right away.
This is not ideal if you ask me.
Some strength coaches do a great job and implement the OLY lifts responsibly, but I’d still argue that teaching these lifts over the course of four years is a drain on athletes’ time, energy and resources.
I’d Recommend the Following Exercises Instead:
Trap Bar Jumps
Trap Bar High Pulls
Trap Bar Speed Pulls
Sumo Speed Pulls
Band Resisted Speed Pulls
Dynamic Effort Box Squats
3. Power Is Plane Specific
Team sport is rarely played in the same plane of motion as the Olympic lifts.
When developing power that transfers over to your sport it’s better to do it in the same or similar planes of movement and joint angles that you’ll see in your sport to have the most transfer.
Using sprints, jumps and throws are great ways to bridge the gap and usually are better options than the Olympic lifts.
Here’s some exercises that can train speed and power with great transfer to sport:
10 Yard Sprints
Max Velocity Sprints
Partner Chase Drills
Rotational Med Ball Toss
Skater Variations
Broad Jump Variations
Overhead Med Ball Throws
Box Jumps
4. Other Variations & Methods
Other variations and methods that have a great effect on power training and can be taught quickly include the use of accommodating resistance with bands and chains as well as contrast training.
Accommodating resistance allows you to accelerate through a full range of motion because the resistance increases as you get into joint angles that can handle greater loads. This allows you to train power at all joint angles in a lift.
In addition to that the use of bands provides a unique training stimulus in which the eccentric portion of the lift is accelerated forcing a great amount deceleration training as well as a high-level reversal strength by using the stretch shortening cycle.
There’re a couple examples of this is the exercises listed above.
Contrast training is a method to peak speed and power production in which you use a heavy compound movement like a squat or deadlift and go right into an explosive expression of speed and power like a sprint, jump or throw.
Note from TG: I posted about contrast sets recently HERE.
The heavy lift provides an activation of higher threshold motor units that will transfer into a more explosive athletic movement.
Here’s some examples of contrast training.
Pre-Season Football Contrast Set
Back Squat —-> Box Jump
Banded Bulgarian Split Squat —-> Half Kneeling Sprint
About the Author
Ricky Kompf is the owner of Kompf Training Systems located in Syracuse New York. His facility provides semi-private training for predominantly high-school and college level athletes with individualized programming.
I started my career as a personal trainer back in 2002.
To give a little perspective on how long ago that was:
Joe Millionaire was one of the top-rated television shows that year.
The standard reaction to anyone requesting almond milk was one of two things: 1) a cold, blank stare into the abyss or 2) a cold, blank stare into the abyss followed by a definitive “the fuck outta here. Making milk out of almonds? What’s next…making pizza crust out of cauliflower?”
MTv still played music videos.
Smart phones and social media didn’t exist.
More to the point…the concept of semi-private training didn’t really exist either.
As I mentioned above I started my career as a personal trainer working almost exclusively with clients in a one-on-one fashion.
I can’t stress this enough:
“You need to be good at training ONE person before you start training a group.”
I have zero doubts the five years I spent working with people one-on-one helped to dampen the shock when I eventually started working with several people at once.
To that end, it wasn’t until 2007, when I co-founded Cressey Sports Performance with Eric Cressey and Pete Dupuis, that I got first-hand experience with the semi-private training model.
Up until then there weren’t many fitness professionals, let alone commercial or privately owned facilities, utilizing this model…and full credit has to go to Alwyn Cosgrove for serving as the nudger and architect for us adopting it.
He and Eric had many, many conversations on the matter, and considering Alwyn had built one of the most successful training studios in the country – Results Fitness located in Newhall, CA – utilizing this approach, who were we to question it?
That would have been like telling Gandalf “nah, I think we’re good. We can handle Mordor on our own”
Compound that with the fact Eric, Pete, and myself knew we’d be catering to the athletic population and that we very much wanted to emulate more of a collegiate strength & conditioning vibe it seemed like a no-brainer.
Long Story Short: The model worked (for us) and today more and more facilities (and individual coaches) are seeing the merits of the semi-private training approach.
Long Story Short (Part II): I left CSP in 2015 to start my own small studio in Boston. And even though I now work predominately with gen’ pop’ clients I still use this model and see many benefits.
Long Story Short (Part III): I am not implying CSP is responsible for the semi-private explosion. But I’d like to think we – along with other facilities such as I-FAST (Mike Robertson & Bill Hartman), Mike Boyle Strength & Conditioning, Mark Fisher Fitness, and many others – have helped to promote its popularity over the years.
Tony, For the Love of God, Shut up, and Tell Me WHY I Should Adopt the Semi-Private Training Model?
1. Yes, It’s Safe
The most prominent argument I’ve seen against semi-private training is that it’s dangerous. The rationale being that people aren’t getting the attention they need and, as a result, things inevitably deteriorate to the point where everyone’s running around with scissors in their hands.
Well, if that’s the case then CrossFit, Bootcamps, and Aerobic and Spin classes are the fitness industry’s equivalent of getting into a hugging match with a grizzly bear while wearing a steak vest.
I think it was Alwyn Cosgrove, fittingly enough, who made the best rebuttal of date to this train of thought:
“People learn to swim and shoot guns in a group setting.”
I think we can pump the brakes on the whole “danger wagon” scenario.
2. People Stay Motivated
I think most people have an inherently competitive side and to that end tend to work harder and (are more motivated) when they’re surrounded by like-minded individuals getting after it in the gym.
Most humans feed off the energy of others. On many occasions I can think of instances where clients end up getting competitive and try to push each other’s envelope.
Of course, it’s important to reiterate to clients not to compare themselves to others and that it’s no big deal if “so and so” can perform seven chin-ups or squat a house and they can’t.
I often use the term “progress, not perfection” when certain clients get too caught up the comparison game. So long as they see improvements (even small, incremental ones) over the course of time that’s all that matters.
That said, it’s uncanny how a group environment will often bring out people’s competitive side and nudge them to work a little harder.
3. Be Part of a Community
I’m biased, but my clients are the shit.
They’re cool.
They’re jacked.
And they’re just overall a bunch of amazing human beings with diverse backgrounds, interests, and experiences.
It’s not uncommon for clients to want to schedule sessions at the same time or to hang out outside of the gym to hit up a concert together, go out to dinner, or, I suspect, sit around and write about how poetic my deadlift looks:
The sense of being part of a community and the camaraderie it yields is an underrated if not unparalleled advantage to the semi-private model, and why so many people tend to stick around for the long haul.
4. See More Clients – Leverage Your Time – Make More Money
This past Monday I coached from 4 pm to 8 pm.
I saw ten clients during that time
I don’t know about you, but I’d rather have a four-hour “work day” compared to ten hours.20
Not only that, on a per hour basis, all someone has to do is basic math to see why the semi-private model works well from a money-making standpoint.
Lets say the average trainer makes $75 per session working with clients one-on-one.
That’s not too shabby.
The same trainer, however, could charge $50-$60/person in the semi-private format and make 2x (if not 3x) that much depending on the numbers:
No doubt these numbers will need to be adjusted to take into account varying cost of living in different regions, but math is math.
As far as leveraging one’s time, the semi-private model is a strong candidate for most fitness professionals.
5. More Cost Effective For Clients
Pigging back on the above, the semi-private model is financially prudent for the client as well; it lowers the financial barrier.
Generally speaking this approach is 10-15% (maybe a smidge higher) cheaper compared to one-on-one training.
That may be the lone incentive someone needs to get them over the hump to seek out coaching services.
6. A Godsend For Introverts
This last point takes a bit of personal angle and may not resonate with some of you reading, but as a self-proclaimed introvert, I can say the semi-private format has helped me a ton as a coach.
It sounds counterintuitive, but hear me out.
I can turn on the charm and be extroverted when I need to. The common misconception about introvertedness and extrovertedness is that they’re both on a spectrum; neither is a stagnant, set-in-stone thing. What’s more, those who identify as introverted are (usually) not socially awkward or a recluse.
Sure, they may like to spend more time with cats than the average person, but they can turn it on or otherwise be the center of attention if need be
However, what “being introverted” really refers to is how a certain individual prefers to re-charge. After marinating in social circles yhey tend to re-charge by being in their own thoughts, at a bookstore, watching a movie alone, or, I don’t know, looking out the window contemplating when season 2 of Squid Game will finally come out.
Now, it’s not lost on me that part of why some people hire a coach is so that the coach can serve as the spark or center of energy.
I find this latter point infinitely more challenging when working strictly one-on-one with clients (especially with fellow introverts) and the impetus falls on me to be the curator of conversation.
Me:“Soooo, you watch Game of Thrones?”
Client:“Yeah.”
Me:“Dragons are cool.”
Client:“Yeah.”
Me:“Okie dokie, ready for your next set of deadlifts?”
Client:“Yeah.”
Me:“Excuse me while I go throw an ax into my face.”
When on the gym floor with a group of people, and the music’s blaring, and everyone’s moving around doing their thing, I typically don’t have to generate any gab.
It just happens organically amongst the group.
THANK GOD.
Some Cons to Semi-Private Training
Semi-private training isn’t all butterfly kisses and rainbows.
1. Some Clients Get Less Attention
Semi-private training is akin to hosting a party, and every client is a guest. The last thing I want to do is socialize with one lone person the entire night (unless it’s Kate Beckinsale) while everyone else is left twiddling their thumbs in the foyer.
Some clients may get irritated and feel they’re not getting enough coaching, and that’s a very valid point to bring up.
I do feel if you take the time to do your due diligence and structure things accordingly – maybe offer a few “ramping” or introductory classes so people can learn some basics, cueing, etc – this is a non-issue.
However, some people just won’t be a good fit for the semi-private model and it’s important to have referrals (or systems) set in place to accommodate them.
2. I Wouldn’t Jump In Right Away
After reading this post the last thing you need to do is contact all your clients and tell them you’re revamping your entire business model and that everyone’s going to be training BFF’s moving forward.
If you do I guarantee you’ll be receiving a few emails with the title:
“Fuck this shit, I’m out.”
Ease your way into things.
Maybe block out a few set hours per week to give the semi-private approach a test drive and to allow an opportunity for a few of your clients to get their feet wet with the concept.
3. It Can Be Draining
Working with several people at once isn’t everyone’s bag.
It can be very draining.
I get it.
Some people prefer working with people one-on-one and that’s totally cool. Many fitness pros still do it, do it very well, and are very successful with it.
I’ve been a fan of “offset” loading for a number of years now. Without getting too deep in the weeds on what offset loading is and what the benefits are…
…it’s when you either stagger your foot or hand position on certain exercises OR you load an exercise a certain way (how you hold a DB or KB) to target or overload a specific limb or joint.
It has implications for both rehab (helping people to move better) AND for getting them jacked (self-explanatory). My good friend and Boston-based colleague, Dr. Michelle Boland, elaborates more on offset loading and how you can use it to your clients’ advantage below.
Enjoy.
Never Question Your Exercise Selection Again
I speak from personal experience, as a personal trainer, when I say it can be challenging to navigate through all of your client’s aches, pains, and movement hiccups.
It has caused me some serious headaches in the past.
In a social media guru filled world, there is so much information about magic tricks to FIX your clients movement struggles. These magic tricks are typically called corrective exercises.
We then think we are Harry Potter and build our client’s sessions and training programs around corrective exercises, making the perfect potion to have our clients move perfectly.
BUT, what ends up happening is that our FITNESS TRAINING sessions start feeling like a bad physical therapy experience.
Our clients are not TRULY becoming better movers.
Our clients are not TRULY gaining muscle or looking better in a bathing suit.
They are in no man’s land, not getting results, and being held back from their physical potential.
. Not to worry though!
(Check out THIS blog post to learn more about the mental barriers that may be holding your clients back.)
I am here to help!! Because I made these same mistakes and learned from them!
I am going to provide you with four simple rules to make sure your clients are still achieving their fitness goals while ALSO becoming better movers.
These rules will provide you the ability to build a training program and select exercises without having to choose between a simple corrective exercise that is targeted to help someone move better and a complex lift that is targeted to get them jacked.
Most coaches’ have go-to exercises for getting jacked and strong which is great but these same exercises can also create some movement restrictions due to the high levels of tension they require, such as a barbell back squat or bench press.
However, simple considerations to where the weight is placed, the type of grip, and feet position (stance) can be changed during these typical go-to exercises to prevent some of the possible movement restrictions.
Below, I am going to provide you with simple, practical programming strategies that will allow you to both load AND improve movement quality for all ages and training levels.
The four simple rules allow you to make small tweaks to exercises in order to help people move better, WHILE still getting 80-90% of a training effect from the loading. In other words, we can still get our clients strong and powerful without turning them into walking refrigerators.
(If you prefer to watch instead of read, Check out my video presentation of these Rules HERE.)
Rule 1. Choose Offset Positions
Offset positions include separating hands and feet from front to back. These positions will allow your clients to feel stable, so they can still try hard, without robbing them of their rotational abilities along the way.
Offset positions benefits include:
Improving rotational abilities from separating hands and feet front to back which helps to turn people’s hips and chests
Initiates alternating positions of the hips with one hip more extended and the opposite hip more flexed
Provides greater variation in your exercise selection especially for unilateral loading
Provides more options to add different weight shifting which helps to create unilateral loading challenges
Offset positions include:
1. The Staggered Stance position is standing with both feet flat on the ground and split front to back. Feet are typically hip-width apart from side to side and a half foot distance apart front to back, but the distance can be altered in relation to base of support needs. So, if your client has a difficult time balancing in this position, move their feet wider side to side. The position initiates alternating positions of the pelvis with one hip more extended and the opposite hip more flexed and can also create rotation towards the back side leg.
The Staggered Stance position can also be challenged with a variation called the ‘Loaded Step’. The Loaded Step variation is a weight distribution backwards onto the back leg. The center of mass should be about 80% on the back leg and 20% on the front leg.
Loaded Step benefits:
This position variation encourages rotation through the hips and chest
You can coach it to be a knee or hip dominant exercise (see examples below)
You will feel LOTS of inner thigh (adductor), glute, and hamstring on the back leg
It supports hip mobility and eases tight posterior hips by allowing someone to feel a stretch in the back leg posterior hip, but try to avoid squeezing glutes…I know how tempting this can be 😉
It encourages more single leg loading or shared loading
2. The Split Stance position is standing with a front to back separation of the legs and includes a reduction of foot contact on the back side foot. The leg separation is wider front to back than the Staggered Stance position and there is removal of full foot contact on the back side foot, such that the back heel is off the ground and the weight is rolled onto the ball of the foot. The position mimics (not equivalent to) a top of a split squat exercise.
The Staggered Stance position can be challenged with a variation called the ‘Kickstand Step’. The Kickstand Step Split Stance variation position is a body weight distribution forwards on the front leg with supportive, light weight on the back toe. Body weight distribution should be about 80% on the front leg and 20% on the back leg.
Kickstand Step Consideration and Benefits:
This position variation encourages more single leg loading
This position variation encourages rotation through the hips and chest
You will feel LOTS of inner thigh (adductor), glute, and hamstring on the front leg
You can challenge the position with where you hold the weight:
Holding Weight With Two Hands Will Limit Rotation
Holding Weight In Opposite Hand As Front Leg Will Encourage More Rotation
3. The Staggered Hand position is a front to back separation of the hands on the ground. Staggering the hands can help with creating alternating movement in the ribcage. The side of the ribs of the back hand will be lower and the upper body will be more likely to be rotated in that direction. You can also help target more side abdominal wall muscles by staggering the hands.
Check out some exercises you can start incorporating today with offset positions:
Contralateral Loaded Step Hip Hinge
Loaded Step Ski Erg
1-Arm Kickstand KB Swing
Staggered KB Hang Clean
Offset Pushup
Salamander Pushups For Staggered Hands
Rule 2. Choose Offset Loading
Offset loading involves having your clients hold weight in less than obvious places that will challenge them in different ways. For example, instead of putting a barbell on your back, hold the barbell between your elbows (see Zercher hold below).
Holding a weight in the front will help target more abdominal wall muscles with less low back issues (see Goblet hold below). Instead of holding a kettlebell with two hands, you can also hold it with one hand to create some unilateral loading challenges.
Check out some exercises you can start incorporating today with offset loading:
KB Goblet Split Squat
Contralateral 1-Arm KB Split Squat w/ Opposite Arm Reach
DB Zercher Split Squat
Alternating 1-Arm KB Deadlift
Rule 3. Alternate Grips
Alternating your grip on the weights can improve your client’s ability to rotate, making them super athletes while ALSO being able to pick up heavy things and put them down. Turning one hand into supination and the other hand into pronation causes the upper body to turn towards one side.
Check out some exercises you can start incorporating today with alternating grips:
Jefferson Split Squat
Alternating Grip Pull-Up
Rule 4. Reduce Tension When It Is Not Necessary
Have you ever had a client who picks up five pound dumbbells to do a bicep curl and acts like they are 60 pound dumbbells?
I sure have.
Encourage clients to create tension and substantial effort WHEN THEY HAVE TO.
Other times, encourage them to back off a bit. Exercises that are not too demanding can encourage improvements to joint range of motion and movement quality IF they are performed with low tension, no squeezing, no death grips, or no breath holding.
Your clients do not need to be squeezing all of their muscles, all of the time, to get a good workout. Low tension exercises can stretch tight areas and improve mobility. For example, the Loaded Step RDL can improve hip mobility and stretch the back side of the hip when it is performed with low weight and low levels of tension.
Loaded Step RDL
A great start would be to select warm-up or cool-down exercises that can be performed with low tension!
QUICK Programming Tips To Incorporate These RULES:
Combine: Every exercise within your training session include the above four rules
Pair: Pair a heavy, bilateral lift with an exercise that incorporates the rules
Consider positions in your exercise selection process, to learn more click HERE.
Summary
Incorporating offset positions, offset loading, and alternating grips into your exercise selection will help your clients gain some rotational abilities, gain hip and rib cage mobility, and add some excitement into their training while STILL allowing them to get strong.
To learn more, check out my EXERCISE SELECTION PROCESS which layers positions, fitness qualities, then individualized variations. Position selection is the foundation of my exercise selection and all the information included in this article about offset positions comes from my quick and concise Position Principles course.
The Position Principles course will help you to avoid leaving behind the greatest factor in getting your clients and athletes to move better. The course provides clarity on positional biomechanics, clarity on terminology within the fitness industry for exercises, a downloadable programming template, and easy steps to organize your program design. After this course, you will never question your exercise selection again.
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to email me at [email protected].
If you enjoyed the exercise videos in this article, check out the MBT Exercise Database for 1,200 more videos to use, embed within your programming, and level up your exercise selection game.
Last week I received an email from Jon Goodman. At first I thought he was going to extend an invite to me to come up to Toronto for a weekend of watching Jean Claude van Damme movies.
But that wasn’t the case.
Fingers crossed for next time.
Nope, instead Jon was curious if I’d be interested in him writing an article for my site highlighting his new & nifty (and FREE) program writing software for coaches.
Uh, hell yes!
Jon is notorious (in a good way) at giving away stuff that he could easily charge good money for. Not only that, there aren’t many people who have had as much positive influence on the industry as Jon…he continuously brings the tide up for everyone.
Check it out.
The Ultimate 5-Step Guide to Progressing a Client Workout
Note From TG: Before I defer to Jon, let’s begin with this: It’s NOT by spotting someone like what’s pictured above. OMG this is one of my biggest gym pet peeves. Well that, and people who refuse to share equipment.21 I don’t know who the person is that gives the okay or thumbs up on all these registered images showcasing a trainer spotting their client this way, but they need to be fired. There’s got to be room in the National Defense Budget to fix this travesty, no?
Workout programs often last a month.
Then, a coach ‘changes it up’ for no reason other than it’s been four weeks.
This is wrong.
My programs don’t start and stop: They evolve.
Every four weeks I’ll review, assess, and adjust the program.
The goal’s to balance fun and progressive overload.
This article shares how I think about progressing workouts.
This is a picture of me in workout attire. I felt like one belonged here but have basically zero pictures of me training. So, here’s one of the few I have. It’s old. K, moving on.
Four-Week Program Assessments Are Based on 5 Questions:
Exercise flow: Did anything not work?
Stalling: Is anything important not progressing?
Limitations: Is anything outside of our control affecting programming?
Boredom: Is the client bored or do they hate anything?
Moving forward: How should I progress the program for next month?
Next, I’ll show ya how I use these questions to evolve my own program.
My goal’s hypertrophy.
The program I’m doing three different workouts repeated twice a week for four weeks (24 total workouts).
BB Romanian Deadlifts (RDL’s) are performed on day 1. This thrashes my hamstrings.
Then, on day 2, I perform BB bent-over rows.
While I didn’t get hurt, the idea of loading heavy BB bent-over rows with sore hamstrings isn’t ideal.
The goal’s back training, not core stability.
With that in mind, I’ll switch the BB bent-over rows for a bench-supported DB row moving forward.
My previous plan (with bent over bb rows)
Notice that the sets, reps, and all other variables (I use RPE) stay the same. When evolving a program, things like exercise selection / grip often change but stuff like sets, reps, order, tempo, etc. don’t.
Beyond that, the flow was good.
Moving on . . .
2. Stalling: Is anything important not progressing?
For each program, there’s 2-3 exercises I monitor progress on.
They’re usually representative large multi-joint movements.
I’m currently basing progression on two exercises:
Incline BB Bench Press
BB Romanian Deadlift
To check up on progress, I’ll pop open the Past Performance tab in QuickCoach:
I’ll then search for the exercise I want (BB Bench Press), and click on it to view performance.
Based on this it looks like progress is stalled.
But I also know that I was coming back from a layoff to begin this program so pushed the weights up quickly to start.
With that in mind, I’m not going to change anything for this phase.
The other key exercise in my routine was the BB Romanian Deadlift.
I’m also happy with the progress and will keep it in the program.
Four weeks isn’t a long time with fitness.
Changing it up too quickly is a mistake.
3. Limitations: Is anything outside of our control affecting programming?
With a 5-month year old baby, my time’s stretched.
To save time, I’m training at the community center around the corner.
A downside is that the DB’s max out at 55lbs––not heavy enough for conventional pressing. (#humblebrag)
Instead of a DB press, I’ll do higher-rep alternating DB presses to increase time under tension.
It’s not ideal but it’s necessary.
The right plan for a client should fit their life at that time, even if it’s not the Capital B-Best exercise.
Sub it in, and let’s move on…
4. Boredom: Is the client bored or do they hate anything?
As a trainer, your client is your boss.
Changing a workout because you’re bored isn’t OK.
Changing it because they’re bored is.
That, and sometimes client’s just hate certain things.
There’s usually a change you can make that’s just as good for the client’s goals that they hate less.
Here’s a few things I didn’t like in my previous training phase:
Cable ab crunches feel weird. So I replaced them with ab wheel rollouts.
Russian twists drag on for me. So I replaced them with side planks.
I switched cables for DB’s for chest flyes as noted in a comment I had sent to myself early on in the previous program.
5. Moving forward: How should I progress the program for next month?
I’m following a four week undulating periodization plan.
Week one is a deload. Then volume increases followed by intensity ramp up.
Week 1 I’ll do 3 sets at an RPE of 8 (Using the Borg CR10 scale).
Week 2 I’ll bump up to 4 sets.
Week 3 I’ll increase RPE to 9.
Week 4 I’ll increase RPE to 9.5.
Then I’ll deload again. And repeat the process.
I’ve found this to be a great way to progress without crushing myself.
If my life revolved around training and I didn’t have a family or business to run, I might be more aggressive.
For now, the deload week each month helps keep my body in check.
24 Workouts Cued Up and Ready To Go
Here’s how it looks on my side as a coach.
From this page, I can reorder and edit anything and it’ll change in real time on the client view.
Then when it’s time to train, I pop open the client link on my phone, click the next plan, and I’m ready to go.
Here’s what the client (in this case: me) sees:
Go Deeper: Watch me share my screen as I build this program in real time using QuickCoach (19 mins)
I recorded myself building this entire phase of programming in real time, exercise by exercise, using QuickCoach.
If you’re interested in watching it and hearing me talk through my thinking it as I go
Elevate Your Brand With Professional Coaching Software Today
All screenshots from this email showcase QuickCoach in action, which you can use 100% free with your clients.
QC is professional coaching software, built by coaches, for coaches.
It works for fitness, nutrition, habits, physiotherapy, chiropractic, and running––both in-person and online.
Join 14,000+ others and register your free account at www.QuickCoach.Fit to start playing around.
Also, as crazy as it is, I think that this is the first time that I’ve ever shared my own workout and thought process behind it.
Wild.
Does this officially make me an Internet Fitness Bro?
Do I need to start posting pics of me half-nekkid?
I have so many questions . . .
Anyway, thanks for letting me share my thought process with you. Hope it helps.
About the Author
Jonathan Goodman has 17yrs in the fitness industry and is the author of Ignite the Fire (1,000+ 5⭐ ). His current project is free software for fitness and nutrition coaches: QuickCoach.Fit. Follow him (along with 100k other trainers) on his Personal Instagram where he is very active.